catalyst2: (Default)
[personal profile] catalyst2
I loved the first Starship Troopers movie because it knew exactly what it was - a satire on militaristic societies - so I looked forward to Starship Troopers 2, thinking that this might explore the issue further.

First check of the watch - 5 minutes in, then 10, then 15, then 20, then .... well, you get the picture


It is always a worry when the sequel to a satirical movie decides to take itself seriously and this movie demonstrates exactly why. The combat scenes early on are just stupid - we have no idea what is going on and I understand that this may be some kind of attempt to show the chaos of battle but this means that for the first 15 minutes or so we have absolutely no character that we can follow long enough to care about. The establishment of just one sympathetic character at this point might have changed everything if it had been done well but sadly .....

And what's with the darkness - I know it is shot at night but find some way of letting us see something or someone, please? Of course, once the lights do finally come on, I realise why it has all been darkness and chaos up until this point - clearly they spent money on something but it was neither set, script not cinematography because all of that is bad, cliched, awkward and just awful. It is painful - and then something happens: we get a genuinely scary movie for about the final 30 minutes or so.

Now I will admit it's not original by any measure but suddenly the tension is there, the claustrophobic feeling of the fortress works well and some great sequences ensue - too late to save the movie and it is all very reminiscent of The Thing or various "human-body-taken-over-by-aliens" movies but it works surprisingly well, given the crap before it. Sadly the very last moments veer into cliche again so it ends on that kind of note.

Date: 2007-06-17 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asgaja.livejournal.com
Ah yes, the second one... mucho disappointing, but I still forced myself to watch it all. Wish I hadn't.

Date: 2007-06-17 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catalyst2.livejournal.com
Much the same as me! I did notice that they are making #3 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844760/) (with Caspar Van Dien back so at least the eye candy will return!) Sadly though, it is written by the same guy as #2!

Date: 2007-06-17 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asgaja.livejournal.com
Holy shit, a third one!?!?!

Date: 2007-06-17 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catalyst2.livejournal.com
Sadly, yes! I can't say I hold out much hope for it though!!!

Date: 2007-06-18 02:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ixzist.livejournal.com
let me guess - michael bay directs and it also features udo kier as a slightly evil psychic scientist.

Date: 2007-06-18 06:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catalyst2.livejournal.com
Nah, Phil Tippett directs and Edward Neumeier wrote the script, this being the same person responsible for the Robocop 3 script and also for Anacondas: The Hunt for the Blood Orchid script - and we know just how scintillating the dialogue was for both of those movies!

Date: 2007-06-18 06:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ixzist.livejournal.com
holy shit, that's bad news

Date: 2007-06-18 06:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catalyst2.livejournal.com
Sad because the first one was quite good - as long as it was understood as a parody of those old recruiting jingoistic movies of the 40's and 50's - but sadly I think these two have lost that in translation, so to speak.

true, dat

Date: 2007-06-18 09:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ixzist.livejournal.com
just like another of his films, robocop

Profile

catalyst2: (Default)
catalyst2

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24 252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 09:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios